Effect of Wind Field below Rotor on Distribution of Aerial Spraying Droplet Deposition by Using Multi-rotor UAV

CHEN Shengde, LAN Yubin, BRADLEY K F, LI Jiyu, LIU Aimin, MAO Yuedong

Abstract

Currently, studies about aerial spraying application of agricultural unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) in China mainly focus on the effect of aerial spraying operation parameters (flight height and flight velocity) of single-rotor UAV on droplet deposition distribution. In fact, the main factor that affects the droplet deposition distribution of aerial spraying is the wind field below the UAV rotor, which is made up of wind field generated by rotating rotor and wind field of external environment. The effect of wind field below agricultural UAV rotor needs to be taken into account in the study of the distribution regularity of aerial spraying droplet deposition. Moreover, the wind field generated by multi-rotor electric UAV during operation is the result of multiple rotor interaction. The distribution of wind field and the effect of wind field on the distribution regularity of droplet deposition are different with single-rotor UAV. In order to reveal the impact mechanism of droplet deposition distribution by the wind field below the multi-rotor electric UAV rotor, wind field distribution below multi-rotor electric UAV was measured by using a wireless wind speed sensor network measurement system for unmanned helicopter, and the impact on the distribution of droplet deposition was analyzed by the wind field in X, Y and Z directions below rotor combined with the condition of aerial spraying droplets deposition in rice canopy, and the regression model was established by making the variance analysis and regression analysis of experiment results. The results showed that the trends of droplet deposition in the plant layers were basically similar, the deposition amount of droplet was decreased from upper layer to lower layer. Because of the different operating parameters, the distribution of wind field below rotor in each experiment were different, but the value of wind speed in different directions showed the decreasing trend in Z, Y and X directions. Among the three directions wind field below multi rotor electric UAV rotor, the wind field in X and Y directions had no significant impact on droplet deposition in the effective spray area, the wind field in Z direction had an extremely significant impact on droplet deposition in the effective spray area, the Sig. value was less than 0.001. The wind field in X direction had no significant impact on droplet deposition penetration in the effective spray area, the wind field in Y direction had a significant impact and the wind field in Z direction had an extremely significant impact on droplet deposition penetration in the effective spray area, the corresponding Sig. values were 0.037 and less than 0.001. The wind field in X and Y directions had no significant impact on droplet drift, the wind field in Z direction had a significant impact on droplet drift, the Sig. value was 0.036. Furthermore, the horizontal wind field in X and Y directions and the vertical wind field in Z direction all affected the deposition uniformity in the effective spray area. With the smaller value of horizontal wind field in X and Y directions and the larger value of vertical wind field in Z direction, the uniformity of droplet deposition was better, the best value reached 36.44%. In addition, the corresponding determination coefficient R2 of the regression model between droplet deposition in effective spray area and the wind speed in Z direction as well as between droplet deposition penetration in effective spray area and the wind speed in Y and Z directions were 0.868 and 0.842, respectively, and these models can provide guidance for the practical application. The result revealed the effect on the distribution of aviation spraying droplet deposition by the wind field below the multi-rotor UAV rotor, and it had an important guiding significance in the practical application such as reducing liquid drift in aerial spraying and improving the utilization rate of pesticide.

 

Keywords: multi-rotor UAV, wind field below rotor, droplet deposition

 

Download Full Text:

PDF


References


1

ZHOU Zhiyan, YUAN Wang, CHEN Shengde. Current status and future directions of rice plant protection machinery in China [J ] . Guangdong Agricultural Sciences, 2014( 15) : 178 - 183. (in Chinese)

YANG Xuejun, YAN Herong, XU Saizhang, et al. Current situation and development trend of equipment for crop protection [J ]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2002, 33(6) : 129 -131. (in Chinese)

HE Xiongkui. Improving severe draggling actuality of plant protection machinery and its application techniques [J]. Transactions of the CSAE, 2004, 20( 1) : 13 -15. ( in Chinese)

http:/у www. j-csam. org/jcsam/ch/reader/view_abstract. aspx? flag = l&file_no = 20130614&journal_id = jcsam. DOI: 10. 6041/ j. issn. 1000-1298. 2013. 06. 014. SONG Shuran, XIA Houhing, LIU Hongshan, et al. Numerical simulation and experiment of structural optimization for air-blast sprayer [ J/OL]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2013, 44(6) : 73 -78. (in Chinese)

SONG Shuran, RUAN Yaocan, HONG Tiansheng, et al. Optimal design and test on expanding duct of wide-swath air-blast sprayer [J]. Transactions of the CSAE, 2013, 29(18): 34 -42. (in Chinese)

LIN Liheng, HOU Jialin, WU Yanqiang, et al. Review and development trend of high clearance boom sprayer [J ]. Journal of Chinese Agricultural Mechanization, 2017, 38(2) ;38 -42. (in Chinese)

WANG Changling, HE Xiongkui, W ANG Xiaonan, et al. Testing method of spatial pesticide spraying deposition quality balance for unmanned aerial vehicle J . Transactions of the CSAE. 2016. 32 ( 11 ) • 54 -61. ( in Chinese)

XUE Xinyu, LIANG Jian, FU Ximin. Prospect of aviation plant protection in China [J ]. Chinese Agricultural Mechanization, 2008,29(5) ,12 -74. (in Chinese)

2014,45( 10) :53 -59. http: // www.j-csam.org/jcsam/ch/reader/view_abstract. aspx? flag = l&flle_no = 20141009&journal_id = jcsam. D01: 10. 6041/j. issn. 1000-1298.2014. 10.009. ZHANG Dongyan, LAN Yuhin, CHEN Liping, et al. Current status and future trends of agricultural aerial spraying technology in China[J/OL]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2014, 45 ( 10) : 53 - 59. (in Chinese)

ZHOU Zhiyan, ZANG Ying, LUO Xiwen, et al. Technology innovation development strategy on agricultural aviation industry for plant protection in China J ]. Transactions of the CSAE, 2013, 29(24) : 1 - 10. (in Chinese)

XUE X Y, TU K, QIN W C, et al. Drift and deposition of ultra-low altitude and low volume application in paddy field [ J ]. International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, 2014, 7(4) ; 23 -28.

XUE X Y, LAN Y B, SUN Z, et al. Develop an unmanned aerial vehicle based automatic aerial spraying system [J ]. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2016, 128; 58 -66.

QIU Baijing, WANG Liwei, CAI Donglin, et al. Effects of flight altitude and speed of unmanned helicopter on spray deposition uniform [J]. Transactions of the CSAE, 2013, 29(24) : 25 -32. (in Chinese)

QIN Weicai, XUE Xinyu, ZHOU Lixin, et al. Effects of spraying parameters of unmanned aerial vehicle on droplets deposition distribution of maize canopies [ J]. Transactions of the CSAE, 2014, 30(5) : 50 -56. ( in Chinese)

CHEN Shengde, LAN Yubin, LI Jiyu, et al. Effect of spray parameters of small unmanned helicopter om distribution regularity of droplet deposition in hybrid rice canopy[J]. Transactions of the CSAE, 2016, 32( 17) :40 -46. (in Chinese)

FRITZ В К, HOFFMANN W С. Update to the USDA — ARS fixed-wing spray nozzle models [ J ]. Transactions of the ASABE, 2015, 58(2) : 281 -295.

FRITZ В К, HOFFMANN W C, BAGLEY W E, et al. Influence of air shear and adjuvants on spray atomization [ J ]. ASTM International, 2014, 33; 151 -173.

THISTLE II W, TESKE M E, DROPPO J G, et al. AGDISP as a source term in far field atmospheric transport modeling and near field geometric assumptions[ C] // ASAE Annual Meeting, Paper No. 051149, 2005.

ZANNETTI P. Environmental modeling Vol. Ц : Computer methods and software for simulating environmental pollution and its adverse effectf M ]//TESKE M E, BARRY II W. ‘Aerial spray drift modeling’. Computational Mechanics Publications, 1994: 11-12.

THOMSON S J, WOMAC A R, MULROONE J E. Reducing pesticide drift bv considering propeller rotation effects from aerial application and near buffer zones[J]. Sustainable Agriculture Research, 2013, 2(3): 41 - 51.

ZHANG Songchao, XUE Xinyu, QIN Weicai, et al. Simulation and experimental verification of aerial spraying drift on N — 3 unmanned spraying helicopter [J ]. Transactions of the CSAE, 2015, 31(3) ; 87 -93. (in Chinese)

WANG Changling, HE Xiongkui, W ANG Xiaonan, et al. Distribution characteristics of pesticide application droplets deposition of unmanned aerial vehicle based on testing method of spatial quality balance [J ]. Transactions of the CSAE, 2016, 32(24) ; 89 -97. (in Chinese)

Lljiyu, ZHOU Zhiyan, HU Lian, et al. Optimization of operation parameters for supplementary pollination in hybrid rice breeding using round multi axis multi-rotor electric unmanned helicopter [J]. Transactions of the CSAE, 2014, 30(11 ); 1 -9. ( in Chinese)


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.