Productivity and Cost Analysis of Sawmills by Pandan Bandsaw YT36 and Vertical Bandsaw MJ328
Abstract
The success of a company is marked by the achievement of productivity. This study aimed to analyze the productivity and costs of sawmills with pandan bandsaw YT36 and vertical bandsaw MJ328. This research was initiated by identifying the working elements of sawing with pandan bandsaw YT36 and vertical bandsaw MJ328. The working time is 20 repetitions, this is based on the number of repetitions that must be examined on the volume of research work. This research shows that the productivity of the pandan bandsaw YT36 is 0.81 m3/hour and the productivity of the vertical bandsaw MJ328 is 0.83 m3/hour, respectively. The operating cost of the bandsaw YT36 is IDR 77,365.86/m3 and the operating cost of the vertical bandsaw MJ328 is IDR 75,995.89/m3, respectively. If idle time can be prevented, the average productivity of the pandan bandsaw YT36 and vertical bandsaw MJ328 increased by 2.59% and 4.29%, respectively.
Keywords: productivity; cost; working time; sawing; bandsaw
Download Full Text:
PDFReferences
FAID N E, BAMBANG A N, MARYONO M. Analysis of the potential contribution of forestry sub-sector in economic and development in daerah istimewa yogyakarta province. E3S Web of Conferences, 2018, 73(1), 10027.
MCGINLEY K, GULDIN R, CUBBAGE F. Forest sector research and development capacity. Journal of Forestry-Washington, 2019, 199(2), 443–461.
UNITED NATIONS ENVIRONMENT PROGRAMME, FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS. The state of the world’s forests: forests, biodiversity and people, 2020. https://www.unep.org/resources/state-worlds-forests-forests-biodiversity-and-people
VERTER N, GREGA L. Export performance and competitiveness in wood products in the Czech Republic and Austria. Ekonomski Pregled, 2019, 70(5), 743–764.
GOVINA J, NEMETH R. A short background to hardwood resources and properties in Ghana. In: NÉMETH R, RADEMACHER P, HANSMANN C, et al. (eds.) 9th Hardwood Proceedings − Part II: With Special Focus on “An Underutilized Resource: Hardwood Oriented Research”. Sopron: University of Sopron Press, 2021: 38–46.
SALIM R, JOHANSSON J. The influence of raw material on the wood product manufacturing. Procedia CIRP, 2016, 57, 764–768.
MUHDI, SAHAR A, HANAFIAH D S, et al. Analysis of biomass and carbon potential on eucalyptus stand in industrial plantation forest, North Sumatra, Indonesia. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 2019, 374, 012054.
BRACK D. Sustainable consumption and production of forest products, 2018. https://www.un.org/esa/forests/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/UNFF13_BkgdStudy_ForestsSCP.pdf
GORDEEV R V. Comparative advantages of Russian forest products on the global market. Forest Policy and Economics, 2020, 119, 102286.
PEAM W L, TAI Y T, CHIU Y T. Production yield for multiple line processes: product acceptance determination. Journal of Testing and Evaluation, 2017, 46(1), 20160529.
PURWOKO A, MUHDI, HANAFIAH A S. Residual stand damages caused by conventional and reduced impact timber harvesting in the natural forest. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Technology, 2018, 9(3), 313–325.
BANAS J, UTNIK-BANAS K, ZIEBA S, et al. Assessing the technical efficiency of timber production during the transition from a production-oriented management model to a multifunctional one: a case from Poland 1990–2019. Forests, 2021, 12(9), 1287.
PRIYA R S, AROULMOJI V. A review on productivity and its effect in industrial manufacturing. International Journal of Advanced Science and Engineering, 2020, 6(4), 1490–1499.
INTERNATIONAL LABOUR ORGANIZATION. Guide to developing balanced working time arrangements. Geneva: International Labour Office, 2019.
ASSIRI W. Risk of loss of productivity in workplaces. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, 2016, 5(5), 118–120.
GIKONYO F W. Factors affecting employeers produvtivity in county government in Kenya: A case study of the county government of Laikipia. University of Africa, 2017.
ALISINOGLUA M B, CAVDAR K. A predictive maintenance application for band saw machines. International Scientific Journal “Industry 4.0”, 2021, 6(4), 139–142.
SYSALA T, STUCHLIK K, NEUMANN P. System for automatic inspection of bandsaw blades. WSEAS Transactions on Environment and Development, 2019, 15, 500–509.
OMONIYI T E, ONILUDE M A. Production estimation and delay analyses of a locally fabricated bandsaw. Journal of Production Engineering, 2020, 23(1), 29–34.
DE MELO R R, DACROCE J M F, JUNIOR F R, et al. Lumber yield of four native forest species of the Amazon region. Floresta e Ambiente, 2019, 26(1), e20160311.
NASIR V, COOL J. A review on wood machining: characterization, optimization, and monitoring of the sawing process. Wood Material Science & Engineering, 2020, 15(1), 1–16.
SOPIANOOR, ZUHDI Y, MAYA P B. Study on the yield of raw materials for logs at IU IPHHK Rusmandiansnyah in Damai District, West Kutai Regency. Agrifor Journal, 2016, 15(2), 1–8.
DE LIMA R B, FERREIRA R L C, DA SILVA J A A, et al. Effect of species and log diameter on the volumetric yield of lumber in northern Brazilian Amazonia: preliminary results. Journal of Sustainable Forestry, 2019, 38(6), 1–17.
BORZ S A, PAUN M. Integrating offline object tracking, signal processing, and artificial intelligence to classify relevant events in sawmilling operations. Forests, 2020, 11(12), 1333.
AGBANA B E, JOSHUA A O, DAIKWOL M A, et al. Knowledge of occupational hazards among sawmill workers in Kwara state, Nigeria. Nigerian Postgraduate Medical Journal, 2016, 23(1), 25–32.
ANISZEWSKA M, ZYCHOWICZ W, ZURAWSKA K. Effectiveness of the technological process of timber production. Annals of Warsaw University of Life Sciences - SGGW, 2018, 71, 43–50.
BORZ S A, OGHNOUM M, MARCU M V, et al. Performance of small-scale sawmilling operations: A case study on time consumption, productivity and main ergonomics for a manually driven bandsaw. Forests, 2021, 12, 810.
RISKADAYANTI O, HISJAM M, YUNIARISTANTO Y. Mixed-integer linear programming model for production planning: A case study at sawn timber production. Journal of Industry Technique, 2020, 21(2), 163–173.
GOEL V, AGRAWAL R, SHARMA V. Factors affecting labour productivity: an integrative synthesis and productivity modeling. Global Business and Economics Review, 2017, 19(3), 299–322.
GINTING E, MANNING C, TANIGUCHI K. Indonesia: enhancing productivity through quality jobs. Mandaluyong: Asian Development Bank, 2018.
CUI D, WEI X, WU D, et al. Leisure time and labor productivity: a new economic view rooted from sociological perspective. Economics, 2019, 13(36), 20190036.
CHUCHEEP T, MAHATHANINWONG N, JANUDOM S. The cost benefit analysis of reduced wear bandsaws. South African Journal of Industrial Engineering, 2020, 31(1), 1–11.
MILEHAM R, CULLEY S J, MCINTOSH R I, et al. Set-up reduction (SUR) beyond total productive maintenance (TPM). Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 1997, 211, 253–260.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
